Gio Ponti, Cover of Domus, 1955

Gio Ponti, Cover of Domus, 1955

Piet Holstein, Casabella 347 Cover, 1970 (via andreasangelidakis)
Marguerite Nixon and John L. Fer, “I’m Scared of Post-War Houses,” House Beautiful Magazine, 1946

Marguerite Nixon and John L. Fer, “I’m Scared of Post-War Houses,” House Beautiful Magazine, 1946

TIME’s 2011 Person of the Year is The Protester (via timemagazine)
Dana Fradon, “Burton, Hodge & Woll Architects: Form Follows Money,” The New Yorker, 2/15/1988 (via newyorker)

Dana Fradon, “Burton, Hodge & Woll Architects: Form Follows Money,” The New Yorker, 2/15/1988 (via newyorker)

A.M. Cassandre, L’Intransigeant Poster, 1925 (via lemodalogue)
panutfla, “Massimo Vignelli-Inspired Eustace Tilley,” The New Yorker Magazine, 2007 (via 2ndavsagas)

panutfla, “Massimo Vignelli-Inspired Eustace Tilley,” The New Yorker Magazine, 2007 (via 2ndavsagas)

Linda Tischler and Kirk Manley, “Bjarke Ingels: Global Architect on a Mission,” Masters of Design 2010 Interview # 2, Fast Company Magazine, Oct. 2010

Art Spiegelman, Cover for The New Yorker, September 24, 2001
‘Spiegelman’s cover for the September 24, 2001 issue of The New Yorker was influenced by the black-on-black paintings ofAd Reinhardt. Spiegelman, who lives in Lower Manhattan, later reprised this image for the front cover of his book, In the Shadow of No Towers (Pantheon, 2004), a graphic novel about the 9/11 attacks.’

Art Spiegelman, Cover for The New Yorker, September 24, 2001

Spiegelman’s cover for the September 24, 2001 issue of The New Yorker was influenced by the black-on-black paintings ofAd Reinhardt. Spiegelman, who lives in Lower Manhattan, later reprised this image for the front cover of his book, In the Shadow of No Towers (Pantheon, 2004), a graphic novel about the 9/11 attacks.’

Saul Steinberg, “View of the World from 9th Avenue”, Cover for The New Yorker, March 29, 1976
‘Steinberg created eighty-five covers and six-hundred forty-two internal drawings and illustrations for the magazine. His most famous work is probably its March 29, 1976, an illustration titled “View of the World from 9th Avenue”, sometimes referred to as “A Parochial New Yorker’s View of the World” or “A New Yorker’s View of the World”, which depicts a map of the world as seen by self-absorbed New Yorkers.’

Saul Steinberg“View of the World from 9th Avenue”, Cover for The New Yorker, March 29, 1976

Steinberg created eighty-five covers and six-hundred forty-two internal drawings and illustrations for the magazine. His most famous work is probably its March 29, 1976, an illustration titled “View of the World from 9th Avenue”, sometimes referred to as “A Parochial New Yorker’s View of the World” or “A New Yorker’s View of the World”, which depicts a map of the world as seen by self-absorbed New Yorkers.’

(Source: newyorkerstore.com)

Daniel Clowes (b. 1961), The 21st Century Zeitgeist, Cover for The New Yorker, May 24, 2010

Daniel Clowes (b. 1961), The 21st Century Zeitgeist, Cover for The New YorkerMay 24, 2010

Knack Weekend Magazine Covers (via opaco)

  1. Iceland
  2. France
  3. Ireland
  4. Italy
  5. Greece
  6. Portugal

_


The Economist, “Brazil Takes Off,” Aug.-Jan. 2010 (via archdaily; harvardgsd)
‘In the August-July 2010 edition of The Economist, Bjarke Ingels and Paul Nakazawa examined Brazil’s potential to undergo a “new urban revolution” with the 2014 World Cup and 2016 Olympics Games. With these two major events being hosted by the same country, Brazil will need to implement long term strategies for properly equipping the areas. Yet, the real solution lies in the country’s “improvements for the large local population rather than merely servicing the temporary needs of the global tourists and the world press.”’

“The Graduate School of Design vs. Business School Studio aims to combine the creative experimentation of the designers with the rigorous number crunching of the economists to evolve practical ideas that are both socially, environmentally and economically profitable. Focusing on the problems and potentials of Rio de Janeiro the studio will aim at generating ideas for how the imminent investments for the 2014 World Cup and the subsequent 2016 Olympic Games can be placed to catalyze long term improvements for the the large local population rather than merely servicing the temporary needs of the global tourists and the world press. The world traditionally views public and private interests as opposites. The interests of the global capital and the local population are seen as mutually exclusive. However admirable and necessary philanthropy is, it will never be the long term answer to a big problem. It is a temporary relief or a short term fix, because it is dependent on injecting energy into a system without triggering a self propelling process. If we have an interest in social issues we need to design business models that improve the living conditions of the poor as a byproduct of a profitable process. We need to design eco systems – systems of both economy and ecology - that operate like urban perpetual motion engines – in dependant of charity but rather processes triggered by investment. With the global attention and massive investment for the two upcoming mega events fueled by the roaring Brazilian economy,  Rio is at a strategic moment to seize the situation and envision a millennium upgrade of its urban infrastructure. What if we could come up with ideas where profitable real estate development and improved living conditions for the favellas might be two sides of the same coin. What if the temporary swell in hotel capacity for the games would trigger better living conditions in the long term. With the creation of Brasilia, Brazil has previously proven its capacity to pursue big ideas for order and progress. But rather than a tabula rasa where pure principles are projected on a clean canvas, we propose an evolutionary model that interprets and intervenes in the existing conditions of  Rio’s urban landscape to breed new hybrids between the interests of profit and the interest of the people.”

The Economist, “Brazil Takes Off,” Aug.-Jan. 2010 (via archdaily; harvardgsd)

‘In the August-July 2010 edition of The EconomistBjarke Ingels and Paul Nakazawa examined Brazil’s potential to undergo a “new urban revolution” with the 2014 World Cup and 2016 Olympics Games. With these two major events being hosted by the same country, Brazil will need to implement long term strategies for properly equipping the areas. Yet, the real solution lies in the country’s “improvements for the large local population rather than merely servicing the temporary needs of the global tourists and the world press.”’

“The Graduate School of Design vs. Business School Studio aims to combine the creative experimentation of the designers with the rigorous number crunching of the economists to evolve practical ideas that are both socially, environmentally and economically profitable. Focusing on the problems and potentials of Rio de Janeiro the studio will aim at generating ideas for how the imminent investments for the 2014 World Cup and the subsequent 2016 Olympic Games can be placed to catalyze long term improvements for the the large local population rather than merely servicing the temporary needs of the global tourists and the world press. The world traditionally views public and private interests as opposites. The interests of the global capital and the local population are seen as mutually exclusive. However admirable and necessary philanthropy is, it will never be the long term answer to a big problem. It is a temporary relief or a short term fix, because it is dependent on injecting energy into a system without triggering a self propelling process. If we have an interest in social issues we need to design business models that improve the living conditions of the poor as a byproduct of a profitable process. We need to design eco systems – systems of both economy and ecology - that operate like urban perpetual motion engines – in dependant of charity but rather processes triggered by investment. With the global attention and massive investment for the two upcoming mega events fueled by the roaring Brazilian economy,  Rio is at a strategic moment to seize the situation and envision a millennium upgrade of its urban infrastructure. What if we could come up with ideas where profitable real estate development and improved living conditions for the favellas might be two sides of the same coin. What if the temporary swell in hotel capacity for the games would trigger better living conditions in the long term. With the creation of Brasilia, Brazil has previously proven its capacity to pursue big ideas for order and progress. But rather than a tabula rasa where pure principles are projected on a clean canvas, we propose an evolutionary model that interprets and intervenes in the existing conditions of  Rio’s urban landscape to breed new hybrids between the interests of profit and the interest of the people.”

Theme created by: Roy David Farber and Hunson. Powered By: Tumblr...
1 of 1